UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard

The only standard you need?

I had the privilege to attend a small breakfast event today where David Partridge, Chair of Related Argent, kindly explained the Pilot Version release of the UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard. Thank you to John Guest, Rockbourne, who organised the event for a brilliant group of clients and developers called the Development Leadership Collective (DLC).

This is a significant step forward for the UK’s built environment, providing a clear, consistent, and science-led framework for achieving net zero carbon buildings.

Note: this is a pure focus on carbon and energy. It doesn’t get confused, distracted or diluted with other sustainability areas of focus such as biodiversity… maybe that' will be next?

---

So, here’s a summary of what it’s all about…

The UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard (NZCBS) is the first of its kind, designed to unify the approach towards decarbonising buildings with a consistent methodology for measuring, proving, and reporting carbon reduction in the built environment.

Developed through collaboration of many stakeholders it provides a clear, science-based framework for creating and assessing buildings that are net zero carbon-aligned.

“net zero carbon-aligned” means that if you expend carbon on a project within these limits, you project will legitimately be Net Zero Carbon. I’m sure many readers of this are aware that until now, spurious claims of ‘net zero carbon’ credentials were common, leading to confusion and mistrust. The NZCBS aims to set a clear benchmark for assessing carbon performance, creating a level playing field that supports credible, measurable claims. And if you’re wondering where offsets fit into this, they’re optional once you’ve reduced within the limits - for more on this, take a look at pages 16 & 17 of the June 2023 Technical Update (found in the archive).

What’s the scope?

The NZCBS is designed to cover the entire lifecycle of a building (modules A-D), from the embodied carbon of materials and construction processes (“upfront carbon”) to the operational energy use and carbon emissions of buildings (“in use”).

It applies to both new buildings and existing buildings across a wide range of 13 sectors, including residential, commercial, educational, healthcare, and industrial buildings, and it recognises the retrofit agenda, extending to cover retrofit projects. It doesn’t currently cover infrastructure projects.

Who’s behind this?

The standard is the result of a highly collaborative effort involving some of the UK’s leading institutions in the built environment. Key contributors are shown below:

The Technical Steering Group, chaired by Katie Clemence-Jackson, played a central role in developing the technical aspects. This group included industry experts like Jane Anderson, Will Arnold, Clara Bagenal George, and Christine Pout, who contributed their expertise on whole-life carbon, structural engineering, and energy efficiency.

Guiding the governance and strategy of the NZCBS is the Governance Board, led by David Partridge, alongside senior representatives from institutions such as BBP, CIBSE, LETI and UKGBC. This body ensures the Standard remains in line with the industry’s needs while balancing environmental imperatives with practical considerations for developers and designers.

Volunteers from across the built environment industry, including architects, engineers, contractors, and developers, have also contributed through Task Groups and Sector Groups. Their input, combined with data from more than 700 individuals during public consultations, has shaped the Standard into a robust framework for assessing carbon performance in buildings.

Pilot →Version 1

The launch of the pilot is the culmination of over two years of technical work. And while the pilot version contains the technical specifications required for buildings to claim net zero carbon alignment, certain elements, such as the verification process, are still in development. The verification methodology is expected to be released in Version 1, following the pilot testing program which will gather feedback from a range of projects across various sectors and building types, helping to refine the Standard before the official release of Version 1 in late 2025.

Although still in pilot phase, there is plenty that stakeholders can do now. For those involved in designing, developing, or managing buildings, the pilot version can already be adopted into project briefs - get ahead of the curve and be ready for verification once it becomes available. Buildings and projects also can start working towards the Submission Proforma, a spreadsheet included in the pilot version, which allows users to submit evidence demonstrating compliance with the limits and targets. But perhaps most important and a key ask from David was for stakeholders to register interest in participating in the Pilot Testing Programme - this is a unique opportunity to shape the future of the Standard by providing valuable feedback on its application.

How does it fit in with other Schemes?

The NZCBS sets itself apart from other sustainability frameworks by being science-led and in-use, meaning that buildings can only claim net zero carbon alignment after they have been occupied for at least one year, with real, measured data to back up their performance claims. This focus on operational performance ensures that the Standard goes beyond theoretical calculations, addressing the critical “performance gap” between design expectations and actual energy use in buildings.

The Standard draws on both a top-down approach (balancing national carbon budgets with the built environment’s share of emissions), and a bottom-up approach (using real data from thousands of UK buildings to inform its limits and targets). This dual methodology should ensure it is both ambitious and achievable.

While other schemes, such as BREEAM or LEED, provide general frameworks for sustainability, the NZCBS is focused specifically on achieving net zero carbon, with stricter limits for both embodied carbon and operational carbon. This makes it a highly targeted tool and David described it as a ‘rule book’ (more like a British Standard) rather than a ‘scheme’ (BREEAM or LEED). He also acknowledged that the industry is somewhat fatigued and confused by many schemes and initiatives, but stressed that the NZCBS is fundamental and will (hopefully in the near future) feature “equivalence criteria” for schemes such as BREEAM or LEED, thus facilitating easy comparison and avoiding duplicate work to do multiple assessments.

What does the future hold?

The NZCBS is voluntary and not legally mandated. However, it is expected to serve as a powerful tool for the industry, helping to shape best practices and inform future policies. Given its alignment with the UK’s national carbon budgets, it is likely to become an influential benchmark in both public and private sector projects, particularly as the pressure to meet climate targets increases.

There’s also a fair likelihood that policymakers will reference the NZCBS as they develop future building regulations - it could even become the foundation for mandatory requirements in the future.